207 So. 2d 52 - Roy v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently January 1994
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 140 So. 2d 597 - State Ex Rel. Roberts v. Cochran · 97 So. 2d 631 - State Ex Rel. Ard v. Shelby · Helton v. Mayo · 155 So. 2d 646 - Pickman v. State · 195 So. 2d 562 - Falagan v. Wainwright
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he underlying concept of probation is rehabilitation rather than punishment and presupposes the fact that [the] probationer is not in prison confinement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““Where the language of a sentence is clear we have no power to change it by speculating that the trial judge meant something else.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“would have no possible area of compliance so long as the intended `probationer' remained in prison serving an existing sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.