Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 207 SW 317 - Eckert v. Stewart

Eckert v. Stewart’s Empirical Analysis

1918

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
May 1980
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently May 1980

15 state decisions

4019181920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 68 Tex. Crim. 295 - Burford v. State · Henry v. Phillips · Steffian v. Milmo National Bank · Burnham v. Hardy Oil Co. · Taylor v. Sanford, Administrator

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ . . . . The case will be reversed, with direction that the trial court enter up a judgment, decreeing to the appellants herein and plaintiffs below the interests to which they are entitled under the wills of their grandparents, and a judgment for such interest as the minors, represented by the guardian ad litem, are entitled to under the wills, and the court will decree a partition of the land to be made in accordance with law. The minors are not appealing, and have not cross-assigned on this appeal; but they are by law wards of the court, and it is the duty of the court, as we conceive it, to see that their interests are protected. Their interests, under the pleadings and evidence in the case, are in common with the plaintiffs and under the same right. As to the adults who permitted judgment by default, the judgment will be affirmed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““It is elementary that, in order for a deed to operate as a conveyance, there must have been delivery with the intent and purpose on the part of the grantor to relinquish control of the deed. Steffian v. Milmo Bank, 69 Tex. 513 , 6 S.W. 823 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““An estate or freehold or inheritance may be made to commence in futuro, by deed or conveyance, in like manner as by will.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.