McDonald v. Whaley’s Empirical Analysis
1918
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 1932
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Estes v. Browning · 37 Tex. Civ. App. 422 - Ullmann v. Land · Fink v. Hough
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Any testimony tending to show appellants’ willingness to comply with the contract, as alleged by them, made within a reasonable time after November 1st, is admissible; but self-serving declarations, counter propositions, or offers in the nature of a compromise should not be admitted.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McDonald v. Whaley““Under their amended pleadings, as they appear in the record on this appeal, the first issue to be determined is whether under the contract it became the duty of appellants to sink the well prior to November 1, 1913,” etc.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McDonald v. Whaley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.