Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 207 S.W.3d 194 - State v. Chambers

State v. Chambers’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
January 2021
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 2021

7 state decisions

60200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Silvey · Cox v. Director of Revenue · State v. Prier · State v. Agee · State v. Wiles

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Id. The owner of the residence testified that he was altered to the car's presence in his driveway by barking dogs. Id. The Southern District concluded that the State failed to meet its burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was intoxicated while he drove or operated a motor vehicle. Id. at 199 . The Southern District cited to the unpredictability of the owner's dogs in alerting the owner to potential threats by barking and rejected the State's characterization of defendant's statement”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[I]n those cases in which the accused engine was not running at the time in question, the State must present 'significant additional evidence of driving [or operating] and the connection of driving [or operating] in an intoxicated state ... to sustain a criminal conviction.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “whether the State presented sufficient evidence that a reasonable [factfinder] could find beyond a reasonable doubt that [Barac] was driving or operating a motor vehicle and that he did so while intoxicated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.