¶1Order
¶2Roy Harris appeals the trial court’s entry of a sentence and judgment claiming that the State failed to prove him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of two forgery charges. We find that there is sufficient evidence from which a reasonable juror might have found Harris guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
¶3The trial court’s entry of judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).