Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

207 S.W.3d 725

Briggs v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 12, 2006

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2006-12-12

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently November 2017

13 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-12-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Order

PER CURIAM.

¶2The current appeal involves a single issue: did the motion court clearly err by denying appellant Leroy Briggs’s motion for an evidentiary hearing under Rule 24.035. Briggs claims his guilty plea entered after mistrial was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent because he feared returning to trial with an unprepared attorney and spending additional time at the county jail. Therefore, he claims, his guilty plea is subject to vacation under Rule 24.035.

¶3Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

/207/sw3d/725 · .json · Public domain