Paraiso v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
207 U.S. 368 · 1907
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 2 district · 22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions (13 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2005 · most notably Russell v. United States (1962), Weems v. United States (1910)
16 federal appellate · 2 district · 22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on O'Neil v. State of Vermont · Missouri v. Dockery · Carey v. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co. · Ansbro v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to understand or accept a pleading that did not exclude every misinterpretation capable of occurring to intelligence fired with a desire to pervert.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Lucero · State v. Wing
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.