Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 207 VA 165 - Hammer v. Commonwealth

Hammer v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 1993
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 1993

5 state decisions

201966197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hammer v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he evidence that rape was not consummated does not negate original intent to rape. This evidence can be properly interpreted as showing only that [the] plan was abandoned.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.