Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 207 VA 455 - Conner v. Commonwealth

Conner v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
January 2011
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently January 2011

5 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

60196619701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Peyton v. Williams · Wilkinson v. Youell · Hudson v. Youell · Vick v. Commonwealth · Smith v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “shall not run concurrently, unless expressly ordered by the court”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Section 19-269 applies only to the serving of sentences to confinement in prison. An order granting probation is not a sentence to confinement. Indeed, it has exactly the opposite effect. A probation order stays, relieves, or prevents a person from confinement in prison. The language of the orders cannot be construed to mean that after the expiration of the one-year probation period there were other probation periods fixed to run consecutively for two, three and four years thereafter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “did not have the right or power ... after the orders had become final, to change the sentences and require that two of them should run consecutively.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.