Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 207 VA 906 - Pettus v. Peyton

Pettus v. Peyton’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2014 · most notably Jackson v. Virginia (1979), 1 Va. App. 435 - Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc. v. Reeves (1986)

3 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

60196719701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mason v. Commonwealth · Pierce v. Commonwealth · Butts v. Commonwealth · Jones v. Commonwealth · Cunningham v. Hayes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The facts that no exception was taken to the judgment of conviction, no appeal from the judgment, or writ of error was applied for by his court-appointed counsel, * * * and that Pettus was not informed of his right to petition for an appeal or writ of error, speak more eloquently than words as to lack of effective assistance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “It is well settled that such a contention must be asserted in a direct appeal from, or writ of error to, the original judgment and cannot be made by a collateral attack on that judgment in a habeas corpus proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.