207 Wis. 2d 367 - State v. Hampton’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently July 2025
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 110 Wis. 2d 485 - State v. Felton · 195 Wis. 2d 388 - State v. Morgan · 203 Wis. 2d 66 - State v. Ross · 176 Wis. 2d 860 - State v. Camacho · 153 Wis. 2d 257 - State v. Amos
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“viewed in the most favorable light it will 'reasonably admit from the standpoint of the accused.' " Id. at ¶ 113 (citation omitted). If the evidence supports the defendant's theory and if that evidence viewed most favorably to the defendant would allow a jury to conclude that the State did not disprove the self-defense theory beyond a reasonable doubt, the factual basis for the defense theory has been satisfied and the court should submit the jury instruction. See id. at ¶¶ 5, 115. ¶ 23. The standard for reasonableness is "what a person of ordinary intelligence and prudence would have believed in the position of the defendant under the circumstances existing at the time of the alleged offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Peters“The Double Jeopardy Clause bars a retrial after a defendant successfully moves for a mistrial only if the prosecutor acted with the intent to subvert the defendant's double jeopardy protection.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“that belief must be determined from the standpoint of the defendant at the time of his acts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Peters
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.