State v. Catlett’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 194 W. Va. 263 - Burnside v. Burnside · 193 W. Va. 657 - Phillips v. Fox · People v. Webb · 193 W. Va. 666 - Berlow v. West Virginia Board of Medicine · 198 W. Va. 702 - State v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]n reviewing challenges to the findings and conclusions of the circuit court, we apply a two-prong deferential standard of review. We review the final order and the ultimate disposition under an abuse of discretion standard, and we review the circuit court’s underlying factual findings under a clearly erroneous standard. Questions of law are subject to a de novo review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.