Nelson v. Darling

¶1Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. The court disapproves of all findings to the effect that the maker of the note after the year 1918 had a place of business; and finds that after the year 1918 said maker did not have an office or place for the transaction of business and did not transact any business, and that the note, when plaintiff exercised her option, was in the possession of her husband, who was the president of the maker of said note.