Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 208 Ala. 210 - Eskridge v. Brown

Eskridge v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

1922

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
July 1989
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently July 1989

16 state decisions

801922193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Doullut Williams v. Hoffman · Sims v. Riggins · Webb v. Butler · DeSota Coal Min. & Dev. Co. v. Hill · Handley v. Heflin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`Where [fraud] relates to the conduct of the suit, as where it prevents a party from asserting his rights, there is no fair adversary proceeding, and equity will interfere. '”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.