Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 208 Ala. 504 - Allen v. Overton

Allen v. Overton’s Empirical Analysis

1922

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
2
states following
March 1985
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently March 1985 · most notably Wiggins v. Stewart Bros. (1926), Smith v. Wilder (1960)

2 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

701922193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on London v. G. L. Anderson Brass Works · Seals v. Robinson & Co. · Crawford v. Kirksey · Pickett v. Pipkin · Thames & Co. v. Rembert's Adm'r

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A voluntary conveyance is one resting on no valuable consideration. As to existing creditors when executed and delivered, it is void per se without regard to the intentions of the parties, unless the property is exempt from the payment of the debts of the grantor. As to subsequent creditors it is valid and operative, unless there was actual fraud in the transaction; and the burden of proving the existence of the actual fraud in the transaction rests upon the subsequent creditor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In writing on the subject of a voluntary conveyance, meaning conveyance without valuable consideration, this court, in McCrory v. Donald, 192 Ala. 314 , 68 South. 307 , wrote:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.