Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 208 Ariz. 168 - State v. Whelan

State v. Whelan’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
November 2015
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ashe v. Swenson · Commissioner v. Sunnen · Standefer v. United States · Sealfon v. United States · State v. King

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although an issue is actually litigated and determined by a valid and final judgment, and the determination is essential to the judgment, relitigation of the issue in a subsequent action between the parties is not precluded in the following circumstances: (2) The issue is one of law and ... (b) a new determination is warranted in order to take account of an intervening change in the applicable legal context or otherwise to avoid inequitable administration of the laws....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the issue sought to be relitigated must be precisely the same as the issue in the previous litigation; a final decision on the issue must have been necessary for the judgment in the prior litigation; there must be mutuality of parties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.