State v. Hampton’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably State v. Bearup (2009), Commonwealth v. Means (2009)
29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Faretta v. California · Douglas v. People of State of California · Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District · State v. Bible · United States v. Goldberg
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“severe misconduct or a course of disruption aimed at thwarting judicial proceedings.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Franklin · State v. Trass“Although a defendant is entitled to counsel ... he can effectively forgo that assistance through his actions.’’); State v. Delvecchio, 110 Ariz. 396, 401 , 519 P.2d 1137, 1142 (1974) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Eddie O.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.