State v. Armstrong’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably State v. Roque (2006), State v. Armstrong (2008)
35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bruton v. United States · Berger v. United States · Oregon v. Kennedy · State v. Chapple · Pool v. Superior Court
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the state has an obligation under Rule 15.1 to disclose material information not in its possession or under its conti’ol only if (1) the state has better access to the information; (2) the defense shows that it has made a good faith effort to obtain the information without success; and (3) the information has been specifically requested by the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Bernini
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.