Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 208 Ark. 788 - Moses v. Gingles

Moses v. Gingles’s Empirical Analysis

1945

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
January 1950
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lumsden v. Erstine · Cecil v. Tisher and Friend · Bridwell v. Davis · Plant v. Johnson · Thomas v. Branch, Sheriff

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Obviously the reason the Legislature requires the county clerks to list contiguous tracts in any section, which are shown to be owned by one person, as one tract for publication, is to save costs of publication. The requirement is mandatory whatever the reason for its enactment, and these provisions were not repealed by Act 282 of 1935. Thomas v. Branch, 202 Ark. 338 , 150 S.W.2d 738 . In fact, Act 170 of 1935 was the only authority for the publication of the delinquent land list and the legal fee for publication is 25 cents per tract as fixed by 9, and the term `tract' as there used means a tract as limited by the proviso in 2. It necessarily follows that there was an excessive charge here of 50 cents for failure of the clerk to list the three contiguous calls under one ownership as one tract.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Provided that within any section, a section, quarter section, eighty acres or less contiguous acreage owned by one person shall be listed and published as one tract. All contiguous city lots in any city block owned by one person shall be listed and published under one item and as one tract.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.