In Re Rosen’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently January 2017
2 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 507 · 28 U.S.C. § 158
Relies on United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Butner v. United States · United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd. · Nobelman v. American Savings Bank · Joseph v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Unlike language where the security interest is taken in appliances, equipment or machinery, the “additional security” created by the Funds [escrow account] did not have an independent existence and served only to protect Nationsbanc’s interest in the Residence Property. The tax contributions protected Nationsbanc from the imposition of a statutory tax lien on the Residence Property while the hazard insurance contributions ensured the Residence Property would be protected in the event of destruction. The Escrow Account was taken not as additional collateral of the Debtor to secure the Mortgage, but was created pursuant to the Mortgage to protect the Residence Property. ... Nationsbanc did not receive any additional benefit from the Funds, other than assurance that the Residence Property would be protected.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Abruzzo“to increase the accessibility of home mortgage funds to homeowners by assuring lenders that their expectations would not be frustrated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.