In Re Joseph’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 2018
2 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Zolg v. Kelly · Baker & Drake, Inc. v. Public Service Commission · Cammermeyer v. Perry · United States Trustee for the Western District of Virginia v. Clark · Beatty v. Traub (In Re Beatty)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The conferees anticipate that the panel trustee will work closely in conjunction with the United States Trustee to assist in the discharge of the specific authority granted under Section 707(b). This would include bringing to the United States trustee’s attention any information or evidence of fraud or abuse which may provide the basis for dismissal of a case under Section 707(b). The U.S. Trustee may, in his discretion, bring that information to the attention of the court. The conferees anticipate that panel trustees will frequently appear in court regarding the motions filed by the U.S. Trustee under Section 707(b), as amended. Such appearances will be in their capacity as panel trustee and not as a representative of the U.S. Trustee.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“After notice and a hearing, the court, on its own motion or on a motion by the United States trustee, but not at the request or suggestion of any party in interest, may dismiss a case ... [for] substantial abuse ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“After notice and a hearing, the court, on its own motion and not at the request or suggestion of any party in interest, may dismiss a case ... [for] substantial abuse ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.