State v. Steve’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
55 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently March 2020 · most notably State v. Correa (1997), State v. Williams (1991)
55 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Vermont v. Cox · Hanil Bank v. Michelman · California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Guerra · Griffin Hospital v. Commission on Hospitals & Health Care · State v. Fleming
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]f we consider the bill of particulars in conjunction with the information, the test to be applied is as follows: [If] the state's pleadings ... informed the defendant of the charge against him with sufficient precision to enable him to prepare his defense and to avoid prejudicial surprise, and were definite enough to enable him to plead his acquittal or conviction in bar of any future prosecution for the same offense, they have performed their constitutional duty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the defendant was prejudiced in his defense as a result of a substantial variance between the allegations in the bill of particulars and the court's instructions concerning accessorial liability.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.