The Lucille’s Empirical Analysis
208 F. 424 · 1913
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 1986
1 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on The Lottawanna · The D. B. Steelman · Neafie & Levy Ship & Engine Building Co. v. The Ella · Cuddy v. Clement
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Of course, this does uot bar proof that whatever was furnished was furnished on the mere credit of the owner, and in no sense on the credit of the vessel; but it meets the presumption that there is no lien for materials furnished on the order of the owner, as there is a presumption in favor of a lien when the articles are ordered by the master under appropriate circumstances.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. The Dredge A.““Am agreement or understanding as to whom credit was given may be inferred from acts and circumstances, as well as from express language, as is ordinarily true with reference to all alleged contracts where it must be shown that the minds of the parties met.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. The Dredge A.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.