Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 208 F.1d 431 - Young v. Corrigan

Young v. Corrigan’s Empirical Analysis

208 F. 431 · 1912

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 1961
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 1961

6 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

30191219201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Capital Traction Co. v. Hof · Vicksburg v. Putnam · United States v. Philadelphia & Reading Railroad · Patterson v. Hayden · Hood v. . Sudderth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A detective was employed by the plaintiff, as the result of an item of testimony offered in defense, to go to the town where the witness in question formerly resided and there make inquiry touching the reputation for truth and veracity of the witness, with a view of qualifying such detective to be a witness on rebuttal in impeachment. This the court refused to permit. As to this, the rule laid down in Wigmore on Evidence, § 692, undoubtedly states the law: “ ‘The admissible reputation is that which is built up in the neighborhood of a man’s domicile or in the circle where his livelihood is followed, and it is of slow formation. It is the sum of all that is said or not said for or against him. Consequently its tenor, can be adequately learned only by a residence in the place, not by a mere visit of inquiry, or by a casual sojourn, or by a conversation with a resident who reports the reputation.’ “The court’s refusal to permit this testimony was undoubtedly right. It is not difficult to see the opportunity for gross abuse, if it were permissible to attack reputation through the hiring of investigators.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.