Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 208 F.2d 109 - Rollinger v. United States

Rollinger v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

208 F.2d 109 · 1953

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
May 1981
most recently cited

25 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1981 · most notably Cohen v. United States (1962), Olender v. United States (1954)

25 federal appellate ·

1901953196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Corliss v. Bowers · Rutkin v. United States · Commissioner v. Wilcox · Burnet v. Wells · Finnegan v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Embezzlement differs from swindling or obtaining money by false pretenses in that in embezzlement the property is fraudulently appropriated by the person to whom it had been intrusted, whereas in swindling the property is wrongfully acquired in the first instance by means of some false pretense or device.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Hence, ill gotten gains constitute income for taxation purposes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.