Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 208 F.2d 660 - Scorza v. Deatherage

Scorza v. Deatherage’s Empirical Analysis

208 F.2d 660 · 1954

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
6
states following
March 1981
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 3 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 1981

10 federal appellate · 3 district · 7 state decisions

1201954196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Coombs v. Darling · Arrowood v. McMinn County · Reed, Admr. v. Rosenfield · Peterson v. Kansas City · 295 Ill. App. 504 - Nelson v. Richardson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The use and operation of a motor vehicle or trailer in this state on the public highways thereof by a person who is a nonresident of this state shall be deemed “(1) An agreement by him that he will be subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of this state over all civil actions and proceedings against him by either a resident or nonresident plaintiff, for damages to person or property, including actions for death, growing or arising out of such use and operation ; and “(2) An appointment by such nonresident of the secretary of state of Missouri as his lawful attorney and agent upon whom may be served all process in suits pertaining to such actions and proceedings; “(3) An agreement by such nonresident that any process in any suit so served shall he of the same legal force and validity as if personally served on him in this state.” (Italics ours.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.