Taska v. Wolfe’s Empirical Analysis
208 F.2d 705 · 1953
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
June 1955
most recently cited
6 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Richter v. Seawell · Temple v. Ellington · Meade v. Saunders · Arnold v. Wood · Penoso v. D. Pender Grocery Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The plaintiff, however, left this zone of comparative — if not absolute —safety and, attempting to return to the side of the highway from which she had come, ran directly into the path of defendants’ approaching vehicle. On these facts, she was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law”.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hall v. McKinney
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.