Cella v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
208 F.2d 783 · 1953
Citation profile
46 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 62 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2005 · most notably Cella v. United States (1954), Auburn Housing Authority v. Martinez (2002)
46 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 1010 · 7 U.S.C. § 181 (Packers and Stockyards Act)
Relies on Mooney v. Holohan · Helvering v. Mitchell · Federal Communications Commission v. Pottsville Broadcasting Co. · Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities Commission · United States v. Hutcheson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“administrative convenience or even necessity cannot override the constitutional requirements of due process.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“reasonably apprised of the issues in controversy.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.