Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 208 F.3d 952 - Mason v. Florida Bar

Mason v. Florida Bar’s Empirical Analysis

208 F.3d 952 · 2000

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
3
states following
February 2022
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently February 2022 · most notably Sherri Williams Bailey v. Bill Pryor (2001), Artistic Entertainment Inc Stephen Dewberry v. City of Warner Robins Donald Walker (2000)

8 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

210200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Broadrick v. Oklahoma · Grayned v. City of Rockford · Central Hudson Gas Electric Corporation v. Public Service Commission of New York · Arnett v. Kennedy · Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is not satisfied by mere speculation or conjecture; rather, a governmental body seeking to sustain a restriction on commercial speech must demonstrate that the harms it recites are real and that its restriction will in fact alleviate them to a material degree.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “there is no evidence that the consumers ... are misled if they do not inform themselves of the precise standards under which claims of certification are allowed”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “demonstrate that the restrictions it places on speech target an identifiable harm and mitigate against such harm in a direct and effective manner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.