¶1 Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Martin Peralta-Morales raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
208 F. App'x 310
United States v. Peralta-Morales
U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided December 6, 2006
This page is marked noindex.
U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2006-12-06
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (§ 276 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Almendarez-Torres v. United States
Decided 2006-12-06