Johnson v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1402 · 28 U.S.C. § 1404 · 28 U.S.C. § 1491 · 28 U.S.C. § 1631 · 29 U.S.C. § 216 · 42 U.S.C. § 4654
Relies on United States v. Lee · United States v. Dalm · Nebraska v. Wyoming · Mann v. Koob · Preseault v. Interstate Commerce Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Here, the plaintiffs have limited the class to those plaintiffs who reside in the Western District of Texas in order to avoid the venue issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Abrams Shell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.