Lee v. Uber Technologies, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 9 U.S.C. § 1 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 2 · 9 U.S.C. § 3
Relies on At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers · Mitsubishi Motors Corporation v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc · First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan · Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. Jackson · Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. Jackson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that would have no bearing on the arbitrability of claims they had asserted based on earlier Agreements as to which they had not opted out of arbitration.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“arising out of or relating to interpretation or application of this Arbitration Provision, including [its] enforceability, revocability or validity”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.