Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

208 Ga. 571

67 S.E.2d 760

Mathis v. Rowland

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 28, 1951

Supreme Court of Georgia · decided 1951-11-28

Relies on Smith v. Ferrario · Griffin v. State · Clarke v. Johnson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1951-11-28

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 1979

7 state decisions

30195119601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Hawkins, Justice.

¶1 1. Public drunkenness, as defined by Code § 58-608, is not an offense of which, the courts of ordinary of this State have jurisdiction under the provisions of article 6, section 6, paragraph 2 of the Constitution of 1945 (Code, Ann., § 2-4102), and Code (Ann. Supp.) §§ 92A-501, 92A-502, since such an offense is not a misdemeanor case arising under the act known as the Georgia State Highway Patrol Act of 1937, or any other traffic law. Code § 58-608 is designed as a protection against a drunkard’s conduct, and not his presence. Griffin v. State, 183 Ga. 775, 779 (190 S. E. 2); Peterson v. State, 13 Ga. App. 766 (79 S. E. 927).

¶2 2. The court of ordinary being without jurisdiction of a case involving the violation of the public-drunkenness statute (Code § 58-608), a sentence imposed upon one pleading guilty to that offense in the court of ordinary is void. Clarke v. Johnson, 199 Ga. 163 (33 S. E. 2d, 425); Gibson v. Gober, 204 Ga. 714 (51 S. E. 2d, 664). Consent of parties cannot give a court jurisdiction of a subject matter when it has none by law. Smith v. Ferrario, 105 Ga. 51, 53 (31 S. E. 38); Ragan v. Standard Scale Co., 123 Ga. 14, 16 (50 S. E. 951); King v. King, 203 Ga. 811, 817 (48 S. E. 2d, 465, 2 A. L. R. 2d, 1181).

¶3 3. The court of ordinary being without jurisdiction of a case of the character above indicated, the sentence imposed by that court upon the petitioner was void, and the superior court judge erred in refusing to release the petitioner upon his habeas corpus petition attacking the sentence on that ground.

¶4 Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.
/208/ga/571 · .json · Public domain