¶1concurring specially. We specially concur in the judgment of affirmance for the reason that the evidence fails to show any restoration or offer to restore by the plaintiff of the consideration received by her for the conveyance which she seeks to set aside. Code, § 37-104; Hendrix v. Bank of Portal, 169 Ga. 264 (5) (149 S. E. 879).
208 Ga. 646
68 S.E.2d 903
Farlow v. Brown
Decided January 14, 1952
Supreme Court of Georgia · decided 1952-01-14
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 1965
10 state decisions
Relies on Hendrix v. Bank of Portal
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1952-01-14
View the full empirical analysis of this case →