208 Ga. App. 158 - Leventhal v. Seiter’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently July 2013 · most notably 213 Ga. App. 875 - General Motors Corp. v. Moseley (1994), Dibrell Brothers International Sa v. Banca Nazionale Del Lavoro
4 federal appellate · 27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Timberlake v. State · 159 Ga. App. 378 - Charter Medical Management Co. v. Ware Manor, Inc. · Dick v. State · 199 Ga. App. 434 - Arford v. Blalock · Sirota v. Kay Homes Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“parol evidence is inadmissible to challenge the unambiguous terms of the contract”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Kobatake v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. · Warren Kobatake Pleasonton Corp., a Hawaii Corporation v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company Alston & Bird, a Georgia Partnership Including Professional Corporations, Ellis W. Lay, Individually and D.B.A. Wintergreen Nurseries Prince Nurseries, Inc., a North Carolina Corporation v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company, a Delaware Corporation Alston & Bird, a Georgia Partnership“(1) that the evidence has come to his knowledge since the trial; (2) that it was not owing to the want of due diligence that he did not acquire it sooner; (3) that it is so material that it would probably produce a different verdict; (4) that it is not cumulative only; (5) that the affidavit of the witness himself should be procured or its absence accounted for; and (6) that a new trial will not be granted if the only effect of the evidence will be to impeach the credit of a witness. 1”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“On appeal, this court must not substitute its judgment for that exercised by the trial court when there is some support for the trial court's conclusion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.