Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 208 Ga. App. 591 - Bache v. State

208 Ga. App. 591 - Bache v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 2012
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Fair v. Balkcom · State v. Hightower · 200 Ga. App. 681 - Mattarochia v. State · State v. Simmons · Dixon v. Hopper

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[R]eversal is by no means automatic for absence of counsel [at arraignment]. The harmfulness of counsel’s absence must appear. . . .” Further, “an appellate court, using the appropriate standard, may find in a particular case that error committed by the trial court was constitutionally harmless, without remanding the case for further proceedings.” In the case sub judice, defendant argues that “(i)f (he) had been represented by counsel at Arraignment he would not have signed a waiver of his right to trial by jury, and he would have filed appropriate motions, demurrers, and pleas, which could have been beneficial to his defense.” However, defendant fails to explain what “motions, demurrers, and pleas” would have enhanced his defense and he does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence on appeal. . . . [T]he record indicates, beyond a reasonable doubt, that no harm resulted in accepting defendant’s plea of not guilty in the absence of defense counsel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.