Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 208 Ind. 255 - Ule v. State

Ule v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1935

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
8
states following
August 2013
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently August 2013 · most notably Dague v. Piper Aircraft Corp. (1981), Ajabu v. State (1998)

3 federal appellate · 45 state decisions

120193519401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barbier v. Connolly · Stephen Otis Joseph Gassman v. E a Parker · Butler v. Perry · Moore-Mansfield Construction Co v. Indianapolis, Newcastle & Toledo Railway Co. · People v. . Rosenheimer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The subject expressed in an act should be reasonably specific so as to indicate some particular branch of legislation as a head under which the particular provisions of the act might reasonably be looked for, and the generality of a title is not objectionable if it is not made to cover legislation incongruous in itself, and which by no fair intendment can be considered as having a necessary or proper connection. Sarlls v. State ex rel. (1929), 201 Ind. 88 , 166 N.E. 270 . The provision of the Constitution here in question aims only at titles narrower than the enactment. The unnecessary breadth is ordinarily no objection to it. Volderauer v. State (1924), 195 Ind. 415 , 143 N.E. 674 ."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.