Yoder v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1935
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 2019
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Teegarden v. Lewis · Fowler v. Wallace · Dixmoor Golf Club Inc. v. Evans · Ridge v. State · Chicago Hansom Cab Co. v. Yerkes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is further contended by appellant that there was no evidence offered by the State to prove the embezzlement of any money by the appellant, and only evidence of the transactions of credit were introduced by the State. That under these circumstances there was a fatal variance between the affidavit and the evidence and that proof of embezzlement of credits or checks does not sustain an allegation of the embezzlement of money. We cannot assent to this contention.” State v. Ensley (1912), 177 Ind. 483 , 97 N. E. 113 ; Hollingsworth v. The State (1887), 111 Ind. 289 , 12 N. E. 490 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Silver
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.