Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 208 Kan. 324 - State v. Grimmett & Smith

State v. Grimmett & Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
July 2011
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently July 2011

16 state decisions

12019711980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Edwards · Wheeler v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A defendant who has no interest in premises, either of a proprietary or possessory character, has no standing to invoke the constitutional guaranty of immunity from unreasonable search and seizure.” (Syl. 1.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.