Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 208 Md. 316 - Clark v. State

Clark v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
4
states following
August 2015
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently August 2015

21 state decisions

9020012010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In Re the Estate of Findlay · Baker v. Baker · Zachmann v. Zachmann · Wright v. Hicks · Mitchell v. Mitchell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a couple, after the birth of a child in wedlock, would not be heard to say that they have had no connection and their offspring is spurious.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.