Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 208 Minn. 38 - Dean v. Rees

Dean v. Rees’s Empirical Analysis

1940

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
August 1995
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 1995

8 state decisions

40194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Riley v. Pearson · Henry v. White

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The judgment on its face shows no right, title, or interest in the premises to be in plaintiff and no possession of the property by Mm. There is therefore no mistake or fraud apparent on the judgment roll indicating lack of jurisdiction in the registration proceedings as was the case in Riley v. Pearson, 120 Minn. 210 , 139 N. W. 361 , L. R. A. 1916D, 7.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.