Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 208 N.C. App. 118 - Johnson v. Johnson

208 N.C. App. 118 - Johnson v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKey · Veazey v. City of Durham · 115 N.C. App. 377 - Jeffreys v. Raleigh Oaks Joint Venture · Tridyn Industries, Inc. v. American Mutual Insurance · 143 N.C. App. 162 - Embler v. Embler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “properly characterized as a preemptive plea in bar - essentially, an anticipated response to Defendant's potential counterclaims for divorce, postseparation support, alimony, and equitable distribution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “will be lost or prejudiced by delaying his appeal until the final judgment on plaintiff's equitable distribution and alimony claims[,]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “finally adjudicate any of plaintiff's claims.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.