208 N.C. App. 605 - State v. Capers’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Brewster v. Derwinski · State v. Odom · Sullivan v. United States · Morgan Walton Properties, Inc. v. International City Bank & Trust Co. · Suwannee Swifty Stores, Inc. v. Georgia Lottery Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Although we review a trial court's ruling on the relevance of evidence de novo , we give a trial court's relevancy rulings great deference on appeal.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“all evidence offered against a party involves some prejudicial effect, the fact that evidence is prejudicial does not mean that it is necessarily unfairly prejudicial.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.