208 N.Y. 586
102 N.E 1117
Decided April 29, 1913
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1913-04-29
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered November 1, 1912, which affirmed an order of the court at a Trial Term denying a motion to set aside a verdict in favor of plaintiffs and for a new trial in an action to recover money alleged to be due under a contract for the sale of land. The following questions were certified: “First.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1913-04-29
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 1949
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1*588 Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion of Woodward, J., below. First question certified answered in the affirmative; second question not answered; third and fourth questions answered in the negative; fifth question answered, a new trial should not have been granted.
¶2 Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Werner, Hiscock, Collin, Cuddebaok and Miller. Absent: Gray, J.