Cutright v. Richey’s Empirical Analysis
1953
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently October 2016
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Tong v. Feldman · Kimbley v. Luckey · York v. Stone · Purcell v. Thaxton · Hodgkiss v. Northland Petroleum Consolidated
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A grantor in a deed is presumed to have made all the reservations he in tended to make and he is not permitted to derogate from his grant by showing that some reservation was intended but not expressed.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.