Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 208 Pa. Super. 16 - Cady v. Mitchell

208 Pa. Super. 16 - Cady v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2018 · most notably Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn. (1978), Restifo v. McDonald (1967)

9 federal appellate · 38 state decisions

160196619701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Menarde v. Philadelphia Transportation Co. · Fink v. Sheldon Axle & Spring Co. · McCrosson v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co. · Brill's Estate · Flaccus v. Wood

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Wlords used in a release ought never to be extended beyond the consideration.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “all unknown, unforseen, unanticipated and unsuspected injuries”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “within the contemplation of the parties,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.