Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 208 So. 2d 172 - State v. Williams

208 So. 2d 172 - State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
3
states following
August 2012
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently August 2012

19 state decisions

50196819701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · 25 Ala. App. 297 - Smith v. State · 39 Ala. App. 257 - Ray v. State · State v. Alexander · Lindsey v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “deranged and psychotic mental imbalance.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The fact that the accused is under the influence of liquor or drugs, which affect his recollection, does not make his confession inadmissible. The intoxicated condition of the accused at the time of making a confession does not, unless such intoxication goes to the extent of mania, affect the admissibility in evidence of such confession if it was otherwise a voluntary one, although the fact of intoxication may affect its weight and credibility with the jury.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Custodial interrogation in the true meaning of the term did not take place, since it was only at the imploration and insistence of appellee that Judge Dale listened to his confession and simultaneously asked appellee pertinent questions relating to the details thereof. His intoxication, with other factors, had produced mania, making it impossible for his intellect to comprehend what he was saying and doing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.