Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 208 So. 2d 585 - Moore v. Stone

208 So. 2d 585 - Moore v. Stone’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
September 1999
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wofford v. Wofford · Bourn v. Bourn · Thomas v. Jolly · Lambert v. Powell · OLMSTEAD ET UX. v. Olmstead

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is that the grantor shall have had sufficient mental capacity to understand in a reasonable manner the nature of the transaction in which he was engaged and its consequences and effect upon his rights and interests.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.