Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 208 So. 2d 886 - Carr v. State

208 So. 2d 886 - Carr v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

228
cited by 228 later decisions
5
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

227 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 228 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably 895 So. 2d 836 - Bush v. State (2005), State v. Troupe (1996)

227 state decisions

1200196819701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fondren, Alias Taylor v. State · Monroe v. State · Upton v. State · Anderson v. State · Rodgers v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 228 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “beyond a reasonable doubt that accused committed the act charged, and that he did so under such circumstances that every element of the offense existed; and where the evidence fails to meet this test it is insufficient to support a conviction.”
    80 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The rule on this subject in Mississippi and in most of the United States is that the testimony of the prosecutrix, or other witness, is admissible to corroborate her testimony to show that shortly after the commission of the alleged offense she made a complaint, and when, where and to whom it was made. This evidence is not admitted as proof that the crime was committed, but merely to rebut the inference of consent that might be drawn from her silence.” (Emphasis added). 208 So.2d at 888 .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “... a conviction of rape may rest upon uncorroborated testimony of the person alleged to have been raped, but such testimony should be scrutinized with caution; and where there is much in the facts in evidence to discredit her testimony, another jury should be permitted to pass upon these facts... . ( 208 So.2d at 889 ).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.