208 So. 3d 410 - Brown v. Chategnier’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Mulkey v. Mulkey · 879 So. 2d 335 - McKenzie v. Cuccia · Baker v. Harrah's · 104 So. 3d 93 - Walley v. Vargas · 170 So. 3d 265 - Williams v. Griffith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Generally, a report prepared by an expert is not admissible because it is hearsay.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Evans v. Evans“[t]he opinion of an expert appointed by the court is not exempt from this rule.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Evans v. Evans
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.